He said finding a new place to rent was "tricky".

The Scottish bill, meanwhile, does not have a life expectancy timescale. It instead defines someone as terminally ill if they "have an advanced and progressive disease, illness or condition from which they are unable to recover and that can reasonably be expected to cause their premature death".Opponents argue this definition is too broad.

McArthur has acknowledged such complaints but said he does not believe the definition should include life expectancy, citing advice from medical experts.Further concerns have been raised about the risk of coercion, with some MSPs fearing people could be pressured into ending their life.Former Health Secretary Michael Matheson, for instance, told parliament that coercion would be an "inevitable" consequence of the bill.

McArthur insisted the bill will provide dying people with the freedom to choose how they end their life.However, he has promised to review and update guidance on coercion at stage two.

Ethics aside, some have questioned whether the NHS has the capacity and cash to facilitate assisted dying.

The costings submitted with the bill are based on estimates that there will be 25 assisted deaths in the first year, rising to up to 400 deaths after 20 years.Recycling rates hit a new record in Wales in October – with two thirds of council-collected waste now recycled, re-used or composted.

Asked by BBC Wales why the Welsh government was unable to persuade Labour UK ministers to introduce glass, Huw Irranca-Davies blamed the previous Westminster administration and the UK Internal Market Act."It's because of the legislation that was a bequest of the Conservative Party. They really messed it up here a little bit, I've got to say."

He said it had stymied the ability to manage a UK wide-system."It takes something like 1500 degrees to take a smashed piece of glass to heat it up and turn it into something new. The energy costs and the carbon costs for that are significant.